Aytekin B. VII, sy. Bir yandan XV. Yine de, ortada bir ger- 22 A. Tauris, , s. Bu, metodolojik olarak devletin kendine ait 48 A.
|Published (Last):||17 October 2005|
|PDF File Size:||1.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Gardak If in Syria and Iraq urban notables and tribal shaykhs were able to wrest ownership of land from peasants, in Palestine and Anatolia large estates were created primarily through the sale by the state of wasteland that needed to be reclaimed. Usually, land was communally owned by village residents, though land could be owned by individuals or families.
State University of New York Press. Prior toland in Ottoman Syriathen a part of the Ottoman Empire sincewas cultivated or occupied mainly by peasants. These lands were subject to taxation by the Ottoman Kanuunnamesi. A faction of the Zirki emirs succeeded in obtaining the family estates that the Ottoman state regarded as belonging to the state do ai.
As once-family domains and now-state-owned lands were auctioned as a result of the economic policy of the Ottoman government, the encounter involved actors from the same family, arzi also local notables in the environs of land and peasants. Based on the archival resources, this paper elucidates the transformation of the family domains into full-fledged private property in Diyarbekir, Ottoman Kurdistan.
Small-scale landholding aside, this paper argues that the Code led to the emergence of large landowners. The code was thus concerned with determining the kanunnamedi status of the taxpayer, suggesting that the drafters of the code perceived the new legislation as a revenue-raising instrument. The major mechanism for estate formation kanunnxmesi Syria seems to have been peasant indebtedness and default to moneylenders. Log In Sign Up. It was related to the average amount of tithe tax that had been paid by the village during the four years immediately preceding the application of the Ordinance to it.
In the case of the family estates, however, there is an important point. Land Reform was taking place throughout the Middle East. It can be safely argued that the consequences of the Code kkanunnamesi attracted a wider scholar attention than its aims. The fundamental distinction between tasarruf and raqaba was retained, and land continued to kanhnnamesi divided into five categories: Land acquired by lawful means such as grant from a competent authority was, in theory at least, reported to Constantinoplewhere an effort was made to maintain a series of registers known as the daftar khaqani imperial land registers.
If the bids at a Treasury auction did not exceed the local bid, the property would be given to the local claimants. The local auction carried out in Hazro concluded the transfer of the property with a down payment of 70, piasters and dispatched the conclusion of the affair to the Sublime Porte in line with the procedure.
As the arai of large tracts are argued to have been originated from the amassment of smaller state-owned lands, the family estates in Ottoman Kurdistan were from the common category of state-owned lands.
Governing Property, Making the Modern State: Even though tribal presence of the Zirki emirs begs future research, it was evident that the second case was applicable to the case in Hazro and Mihrani. KEITHLEY MANUAL PDF According to this decree, such property would be auctioned this time not to tax farmers but to their prospective owners and the auction of property took place in a two-tiered manner: Classical Ottoman land-tenure legislation made a fundamental distinction between the right to cultivate land tasarruf and the absolute ownership of land raqaba.
Accordingly, the highest bidder, either in the capital or the countryside, was obliged to make a down payment BOA. Despite his ulterior motive was to strengthen the view that the oriental societies lacked class structures and were thus doomed to stagnation, Gerber also asks the questions of what actually happened to lands in the Middle East, how much passed into the hands of large landlords exactly, and whether this phenomenon was universal or whether it was circumscribed by other circumstances Gerber, If a primary purpose of the code was to raise state revenues, it was a success: Skip to main kanunnakesi.
It is frequently asserted that this outcome was precisely the opposite of what was intended by the Ottoman government. True, the family estates were confiscated by the Sublime Porte, however it does not mean that they were regarded as state- owned lands by the Zirki beys, the three-century-long possessors of the lands. Crops were assessed on the threshing floor or in the field and the tithe was collected from the cultivators. Retrieved December 31, from Encyclopedia.
Remember me on this computer. TOP Related Articles.
Kazijora P ope ty as a Co tested Do ai: Land amassment aside, the present study shows that legal readings of the Code and the consequent legal categories associated with landholding does not suffice to understand the change in the property relations in the nineteenth-century Ottoman Kurdistan. Particularly, they were maintained, administered, and eventually sold to private parties in their original statuses. Ottoman Land Code of — Wikipedia The Ottoman government, however, auctioned the escheated family domains following the promulgation of the Code with fiscal concerns. The local auction carried out in Hazro concluded the transfer of the property with a down payment of 70, piasters and dispatched the conclusion of the affair to the Sublime Porte in line the procedure.
1858 ARAZI KANUNNAMESI PDF